GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 21th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.1k
c/glp1science·submitted 2 years ago by u/swirl_dont_shake

[Lab] 21th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part

Needs Sourcebranch of 9 comments

gastric emptying. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/survodutide is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort gastric emptying out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 16…

Read the full submission and all 30 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 2 years ago
u/wholesome_lurker404 points·2 years ago

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakeOPreconstitution193 points·2 years ago

The pharmacology literature is interesting but rodent models do not scale linearly to human dosing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vomit_free_since147 points·2 years ago

do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_danquah67 points·2 years ago·edited

do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 7 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard33 points·2 years ago

Rodent, human, or in vitro?

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyeman128 points·2 years ago

rodent half-life tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]60 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksen-26 points·2 years ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakeOPreconstitution237 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1science

The mechanism layer: incretin physiology, receptor distribution, gastric emptying, central appetite signalling, glucagon-receptor contribution, amylin co-agonism, and the pharmacokinetics that make weekly dosing possible. Papers get cited by journal and year or they get a [needs source] reply.

50kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/glp1science rules
  1. Cite the paper: journal, year, first author. Links optional, citation mandatory.
  2. Mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation.
  3. No extrapolating rodent data to human dosing without saying that is what you are doing.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.