does cycle actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: cycle matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 3 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Crossposting this to c/darkspot because the people who need it are not reading this community.
This is correct. PCOS is real.
Came off after 76 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
Crossposting this to c/darkspot because the people who need it are not reading this community.
the perimenopause question is under-powered in trials
[removed by moderator]
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
The reflux was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
- 1Crossposting this to c/darkspot because the people who need it are not…6 comments in this branch · started by u/elodie_kuipers