GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
14k
c/hplc·posted 2 years ago by u/zeynep_zielinski

[Lab] SGN cagri — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%

Lab Cold Box ×4 Well Actually ×2 Long Haul ×3

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.

The advice on integration in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.

I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.

56,569 up / 42,617 down57% upvoted34 commentsid vpo0fx9 Mar 2024

34 comments

4 in this archive, depth 2

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/micro_bump_mick2.5k points·2 years ago

instrument quality is less important than analyst consistency

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_rasmussen1.1k points·2 years ago

instrument quality is less important than analyst consistency

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 76 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_petrescu1.7k points·2 years ago

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical-5 points·2 years ago

Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 10. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/hplc

The analytical deep end: RP-HPLC methods, gradient design, integration decisions, LC-MS confirmation, amino-acid analysis, water content, and why two labs can report 98.1% and 96.4% on the same vial and both be right. Post the chromatogram, not the summary line.

32kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/hplc
c/hplc rules
  1. Chromatogram or it did not happen. Axis labels included.
  2. State the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume.
  3. Area% is not mass%. Posts that conflate them get a correction flair, not a removal.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/sig_figs_samu/hplc_hobbyistu/peak_area_peteu/mass_spec_maggie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →