[Meta] the method development rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
method development. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/dosinglogs is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort method development out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 21 months. My eGFR was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 25. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
chromatogram or it did not happen
[removed by moderator]
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
the detector wavelength matters more than people think
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
[removed by moderator]
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 95 weeks to accept.
- 1chromatogram or it did not happen7 comments in this branch · started by u/canada_coverage
- 2okay but what dose5 comments in this branch · started by u/downvote_magnet