Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of copay: what the trials say vs what this community says — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.7k
copay: what the trials say vs what this community says
Right, the formulary question again, but with numbers this time. I have 11 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
copay is separate from coverage
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
the carve-out clause varies by employer
Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 24. Does not change your point but people will quote it.