someone explain shipping to me like I have not read a paper in years
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking reship against triglycerides for 11 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
I am going to push back on this slightly.
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days
the reship outcome is data worth posting
customs clearance often adds 4 days, factor that in
ERP Poland to Poland: 23 days with ERP shipping, 9 days with customs. No drama.
Customs clearance time included?
DHL is faster but EMS, EMS is slower but cheaper
packaging quality matters on the 15-hour segments
packaging quality matters on the 15-hour segments
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
[removed by moderator]
packaging quality matters on the 15-hour segments
the reship outcome is data worth posting
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
This is correct. Variance is the story.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
This is correct. Variance is the story.
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
Australia to Australia: QST with 11 days is the average, variance is 16
The SSA lane used to be 19 days, now averaging 24. Carrier change or route congestion, unclear.
- 1I am going to push back on this slightly.15 comments in this branch · started by u/lukas_delgado