[Below Spec] 61.2% on a vial that shipped with a 99% COA
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 5mg to 1.7mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 15 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have reflux I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 29 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Crossposting this to c/survodutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 6 points, both inside inter-lab variance
the 95.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 4 points, both inside inter-lab variance
My PeptideMeter result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. QST deserves that note in the directory.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
- 1the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 6 points, both…5 comments in this branch · started by u/yusuf_kirchner
- 2Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.4 comments in this branch · started by u/refund_ledger