GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
592
c/labresults·posted 2 years ago by u/plateau_patrol

why does nobody talk about batch

PeptideMeter Clean Column ×9

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking purity against eGFR for 9 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

5,416 up / 4,824 down53% upvoted15 commentsid 1nolgk30 Jan 2024

15 comments

9 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/britta_boateng104 points·2 years ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Janoshik, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca56 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimani89 points·2 years ago

inter-lab variance is real, 5 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust48 points·2 years ago

the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/edit_for_clarity40 points·2 years ago

sample of one, say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_demir31 points·2 years ago

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik-28 points·2 years ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/thandi_solberg13 points·2 years ago

You have restated the marketing copy.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 34 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.