GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PSA] Janoshik is not what most of this community thinks it is — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.
829
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/greta_nilsen

[PSA] Janoshik is not what most of this community thinks it is

Discussionbranch of 10 comments

Been lurking in c/bloodwork for about 16 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 25, 5mg, and PeptideMeter is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 9 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 2 years ago
u/noor_cardoso84 points·2 years ago

the 94.2% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial19 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran9 points·2 years ago

multiple batches from WWB show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/plateau_patrol4 points·2 years ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melMOD46 points·2 years ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi37 points·2 years ago·edited

the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_nilsenOP0 points·2 years ago

Is that 97.4% area or mass?

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial30 points·2 years ago

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran13 points·2 years ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity20 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 99.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.