Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date — 49 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.2k
[Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: purity matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 4 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 37 people measuring the same…
Batch number? Date of test?
the VendorInvestigate and Medutest results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
Tested 24 batches from ERP over 2 weeks. Spread was 97.2% to 97.4, mostly 97.2. Consistent vendor.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
SGN / BPC / batch 14 / Janoshik / 99.3% — that is the shape