GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PSA] test results is not what most of this community thinks it is — 37 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.9k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/tuva_kirchner

[PSA] test results is not what most of this community thinks it is

Janoshikbranch of 9 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 2.5mg, week 58, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — test results — and tracked it for 3 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So…

Read the full submission and all 37 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/whois_wanda33 points·1 year ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_mensa48 points·1 year ago

CPC claimed 98.4%, VendorInvestigate came back 98.7%. 9 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchnerOP23 points·1 year ago

The Medutest result at 98.0% was below the 98.1% claim. FGP retested at their cost and came back 98.0%. Logged as resolved.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]9 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen19 points·1 year ago

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial13 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_cardoso15 points·1 year ago

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_nilsen3 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen14 points·1 year ago

the 99.0% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.