GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] Janoshik — what am I missing here — 23 comments in the full submission. View in context.
620
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/plateau_patrol

[Question] Janoshik — what am I missing here

Below Specbranch of 8 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: Medutest matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 5 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 31 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 23 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/nadia_trevino83 points·2 years ago

Is that 98.4% area or mass?

replysharereportpermalink
u/plateau_patrolOP40 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]26 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_ogunleye66 points·2 years ago

the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 13 points, both inside inter-lab variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/lift_heavy_thingsresistance training22 points·2 years ago

multiple batches from JEEP show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/jonas_cardoso17 points·2 years ago

the 98.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso10 points·2 years ago

Not to be pedantic but Janoshik and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/plateau_patrolOP8 points·2 years ago

Not to be pedantic but Janoshik and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 93.7% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →