GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
384
c/labresults·posted 2 years ago by u/rina_bergstrom

Medutest: what the trials say vs what this community says

Below Spec Clean Column ×1

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.

Setup: 2.5mg, week 50, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — below spec — and tracked it for 16 weeks.

Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.

Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.

396 up / 12 down97% upvoted7 commentsid 1rajg31 Dec 2023

7 comments

7 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/ismael_nwosu42 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansen32 points·2 years ago

Batch number? Date of test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi11 points·2 years ago

the 98.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_bergstromOP6 points·2 years ago

The Janoshik result at 98.9% was below the 99.2% claim. QST retested at their cost and came back 98.9%. Logged as resolved.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_trevino7 points·2 years ago·edited

the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_bergstromOP4 points·2 years ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand19 points·2 years ago·edited

Which Medutest service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.