GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PeptideMeter] ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace — 22 comments in the full submission. View in context.
441
c/labresults·submitted 1 months ago by u/janoshik_junkie

[PeptideMeter] ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace

PeptideMeterbranch of 7 comments

Week 77 update. 43kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 22. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux. The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering,…

Read the full submission and all 22 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 months ago
u/diego_szabo12 points·1 months ago
appreciate you saying you do not know
replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca0 points·1 months ago

Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/asks_dumb_questions1 point·1 months ago

Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieOPindependent tester8 points·1 months ago

My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. GGPeps deserves that note in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_weiss6 points·1 months ago

the VendorInvestigate and Medutest results differ by 15 points, both inside inter-lab variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/ravi_sandvik0 points·1 months ago

inter-lab variance is real, 3 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/due_diligence_dee3 points·1 months ago

QYB / BPC / batch 21 / PeptideMeter / 97.4% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →