[Results] 42 weeks, 16kg, and below spec was the hard part
PeptideMeter. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/orforglipron is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort PeptideMeter out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 3 months. My A1c was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
The Janoshik result at 97.2% was below the 97.4% claim. WXT retested at their cost and came back 97.2%. Logged as resolved.
the 98.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. SGN deserves that note in the directory.
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
ERP claimed 93.7%, Janoshik came back 96.2%. 4 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. JEEP deserves that note in the directory.
- 1My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare.…7 comments in this branch · started by u/hugo_pires
- 2Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.4 comments in this branch · started by u/jarno_cabrera