GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.8k
c/labresults·submitted 3 months ago by u/ismael_eriksen

Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right

Labbranch of 10 comments

Quick one. Canada here. purity works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 10 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 3 months ago
u/ewan_marchand92 points·3 months ago

Was that the vendor COA or your own test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_rasmussen61 points·3 months ago

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

replysharereportpermalink
u/ffmi_watcher17 points·3 months ago

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi19 points·3 months ago·edited

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_vermeulen13 points·3 months ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reship_roulette5 points·3 months ago

inter-lab variance is real, 3 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom38 points·3 months ago

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thandi_solberg27 points·3 months ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_cardoso9 points·3 months ago·edited

Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_ogunleye3 points·3 months ago

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.