anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30
PeptideMeter. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/coa is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort PeptideMeter out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 4 months. My ApoB was…
JEEP / BPC / batch 18 / VendorInvestigate / 93.7% — that is the shape
Slight fix: the number was 98.9, not 99.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
multiple batches from GGPeps show a spread, that is the data
inter-lab variance is real, 9 points is inside normal
this is the answer
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 33. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 16 points, both inside inter-lab variance
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed