GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
2.2k

22 months in and timeframe is still the thing I get wrong

Discussion Clean Column ×9 Cold Box ×2

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.

Setup: 1.7mg, week 28, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — timeframe — and tracked it for 6 weeks.

Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.

Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.

2,268 up / 60 down97% upvoted56 commentsid mm83ri21 Mar 2025

56 comments

25 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/ismael_eriksen144 points·1 year ago
post the spreadsheet
replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics111 points·1 year ago

include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_correia38 points·1 year ago·edited

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_halvorsen73 points·1 year ago·edited

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani38 points·1 year ago·edited

post the spreadsheet

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 58 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_cardoso9 points·1 year ago

text removes the comparison trap

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_grimaldi18 points·1 year ago

Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?

replysharereportpermalink
u/reta_and_regret24 points·1 year ago

non-scale victories count, post them

replysharereportpermalink
u/niels_roos8 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (5) →
u/search_before_post-7 points·1 year ago

Week 90 for me and the honest summary is: 38kg down, early fullness manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_villalobos1 point·1 year ago

text removes the body-shaming pile-on

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post1 point·1 year ago

no images, none, not even redacted ones

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox1 point·1 year ago

Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp1 point·1 year ago

the milestone milestone is worth posting

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_karlsen1 point·1 year ago

This is correct. Process matters more than the number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it57 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. NSV counts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaplan_meier_kim35 points·1 year ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it10 points·1 year ago

text only is the whole point of the community

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers68 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/still_here_202641 points·1 year ago

non-scale victories count, post them

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.