GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
344
c/progresspics·posted 4 days ago by u/karma_irrelevant

how did people actually decide "this is my number" instead of just chasing lower forever

Discussion Long Haul ×7

Getting close to a number I picked somewhat arbitrarily at the start and now second-guessing whether it's actually the right number or just the number I happened to write down 14 months ago. How did other people land on their actual stopping point?

434 up / 90 down83% upvoted15 commentsid yp5ctf26 Jul 2026

15 comments

14 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/maintenance_mode_maxmaintenance143 points·3 days ago

mine changed twice along the way, honestly. started with a BMI-chart number, revised it once my body comp started looking different than expected, revised it again after talking it through with whoever manages my care. "the number I wrote down at the start" is rarely the right final answer for anyone I've talked to.

replysharereportpermalink
u/karma_irrelevantOP68 points·3 days ago

that's reassuring actually, was worried "changing my goal" meant I was being indecisive rather than just... learning more about my own situation as I went

replysharereportpermalink
u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp91 points·3 days ago

would push back gently on using scale weight alone to decide "done" at all, body comp (even just a home bioimpedance scale, imperfect as those are) gave me a much better signal for when I'd actually reached a healthy composition than the number on the scale did.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it54 points·4 days ago

ultimately this is a conversation for whoever manages your care rather than a number a comment thread can hand you, but "it's changed twice and that's normal" seems like the most useful thing anyone's said so far.

replysharereportpermalink
u/titration_marshalMOD41 points·4 days ago

Good thread. Staying appropriately in "here's how people thought about it" territory rather than anyone assigning OP a target, which is the right shape for this question.

replysharereportpermalink
u/still_here_202628 points·3 days ago

three years on this account and my honest answer is I still don't have a fixed number, I have a range I'm comfortable holding within, which turned out to be more useful than a single target ever was.

replysharereportpermalink
u/karma_irrelevantOP17 points·3 days ago

a range instead of a point is a genuinely useful reframe, hadn't considered that

replysharereportpermalink
u/still_here_202611 points·3 days ago

it also takes the pressure off any single week's number mattering too much, which is a nice side benefit

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]0 points·4 days ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/quiet_reader_9913 points·3 days ago

following this closely, approaching the same fork in the road myself

replysharereportpermalink
u/lipid_panel_larrybloodwork9 points·3 days ago

I used bloodwork targets alongside a weight range rather than weight alone, ApoB and the scale together painted a clearer "done" picture than either one on its own

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it5 points·4 days ago

good thread, appreciate that nobody's tried to hand OP a number

replysharereportpermalink
u/ffmi_watcher4 points·3 days ago

track FFMI too if you can, celebrating a weight number that came partly from muscle loss isn't really "done" in the way that matters

replysharereportpermalink
u/karma_irrelevant2 points·3 days ago

fwiw "a range not a point" is going in my own notes for later

replysharereportpermalink
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.