GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Confirmed] recycled COA PDF — same producer string, same timestamp, three vendors — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
950
c/scamalerts·submitted 13 days ago by u/scam_taxonomy

[Confirmed] recycled COA PDF — same producer string, same timestamp, three vendors

Confirmedbranch of 4 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: fake COA matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 9 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 33 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 42 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 12 days ago
u/whois_wandaMOD54 points·12 days ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sock_puppet_spotter81 points·12 days ago

Retitled to remove editorialising.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]58 points·11 days ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_notes20 points·11 days ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →