[Pattern] the nine scams. that is it. there are only nine.
Right, the PDF metadata question again, but with numbers this time. I have 5 data points over 10 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
[removed by moderator]
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
the TFC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved