GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
-53
c/scamalerts·posted 1 year ago by u/gastric_emptying_g

is it normal to get early fullness at week 19

Pattern

Right, the PDF metadata question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 10 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 90, not week 44. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

104 up / 157 down40% upvoted9 commentsid 1m18fx6 Nov 2024

9 comments

9 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/jarno_cabrera10 points·1 year ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]4 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira10 points·1 year ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers7 points·1 year ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/gastric_emptying_gOP6 points·1 year ago

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_aalto2 points·1 year ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/tobias_barros1 point·1 year ago

Did QYB respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_guerrero6 points·1 year ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_report4 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.