[Discussion] the PDF metadata advice in here is 17 years out of date
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 7.5mg, week 77, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — cloned site — and tracked it for 4 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The cloned JEEP store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 11 seconds.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Water content matters more than people think.
Adding to this: scam is doing more work than the comment implies.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 66 weeks to accept.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
The cloned JEEP store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 10 seconds.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
- 1Dated screenshot or is this from memory?7 comments in this branch · started by u/ismael_pires