GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 26 comments in the full submission. View in context.
420
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 years ago by u/kaplan_meier_kim

[Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

PSAbranch of 5 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 0.25mg to 10mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 23 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have muscle…

Read the full submission and all 26 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 2 years ago
u/aleksi_marchand12 points·2 years ago

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chidi_vermeulen5 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi10 points·2 years ago

The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 93.7% but QSC claimed 95.1%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabrera12 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz8 points·2 years ago·edited

The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 93.7% but QSC claimed 95.1%.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →