GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about exit scam until somebody posts a number — 40 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.4k
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 years ago by u/britt_zamora

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about exit scam until somebody posts a number

Confirmedbranch of 5 comments

fake COA. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/researchpeptides is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort fake COA out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 17 months.…

Read the full submission and all 40 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 2 years ago
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts155 points·2 years ago

the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_202436 points·2 years ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_jansen52 points·2 years ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik14 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard11 points·2 years ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.