14 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/semaglutide repeats that cloned site is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 23 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
Not to be pedantic but PDF metadata and scam are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
[removed by moderator]
the FGP situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag