GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of scam: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
6k
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/freya_onwuka

scam: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1

Confirmedbranch of 5 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/reconstitution repeats that group buy is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 16 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago
u/bianca_demir323 points·1 year ago

Did MKM respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei75 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palacios243 points·1 year ago

the QYB situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
u/sock_puppet_spotter220 points·1 year ago

Batch 17 appeared on WWB, ERP, and WWB claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_yildiz0 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.