GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of Germany: exit scam, and what it actually costs here — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.6k
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/careful_gradient_notes

Germany: exit scam, and what it actually costs here

Patternbranch of 6 comments

Right, the PDF metadata question again, but with numbers this time. I have 18 data points over 18 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/nikhil_lindqvist199 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_boateng236 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvik152 points·1 year ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_chukwu142 points·1 year ago

group buy exit scams follow a pattern

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_nilsen67 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_notesOP49 points·1 year ago

The cloned SGN store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 18 seconds.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →