[PSA] a discount code in a first comment is an instant ban and here is why
I have had 11 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 16 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 98.4% against a claimed 97.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with cloned site, not with what you concluded.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 85 weeks to accept.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Not to be pedantic but group buy and scam are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
The cloned SSA store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 21 seconds.
- 1fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance7 comments in this branch · started by u/georgi_tamm
- 2sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions5 comments in this branch · started by u/zaid_eriksen