[Unverified] anyone else get a DM offering "wholesale pricing"
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: cloned site matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 9 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Which order and did you have any communication from GGPeps?
Mechanistically the bit that matters is exit scam. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is exit scam. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
- 1Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…6 comments in this branch · started by u/sock_puppet_spotter