help me understand fake COA, I have read the wiki twice
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 0.5mg to 12.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 15 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have reflux I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 35 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
The QYB exit scam collected 20 orders and disappeared. Order ids 30 through 20 all silent.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 27. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
Which order and did you have any communication from SSA?
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Did MKM respond or ghost you?
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
the HJ situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
Can you post the Medutest result that shows the problem?
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
- 1genuinely useful, thanks9 comments in this branch · started by u/archived_thread_a
- 2group buy exit scams follow a pattern6 comments in this branch · started by u/scam_taxonomy