the fraud question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
PDF metadata. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/researchpeptides is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort PDF metadata out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 7…
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
The Medutest results I got back showed 96.8% but GL Biochem claimed 95.1%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting