small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 10mg to 2.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 22 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have early fullness I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 4 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Crossposting this to c/semaglutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Batch 11 appeared on QST, Homopeptide, and QST claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
Crossposting this to c/semaglutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is fake COA. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is fake COA.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 41 weeks to accept.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is fake COA.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 87 weeks to accept.
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 8. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Which order and did you have any communication from SGN?
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
Batch 17 appeared on SSA, WXT, and SSA claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
Not to be pedantic but scam and cloned site are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Did Homopeptide respond or ghost you?
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Batch 24 appeared on QYB, BCH, and QYB claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
- 1Crossposting this to c/semaglutide because the people who need it are not…10 comments in this branch · started by u/neha_mwangi
- 2wrong community but useful, so, shrug7 comments in this branch · started by u/nordic_pricing