GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of cloned site is the most under-discussed thing in c/hplc — 39 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1k
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 months ago by u/quiet_moderator

cloned site is the most under-discussed thing in c/hplc

Resolvedbranch of 8 comments

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on PDF metadata in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers…

Read the full submission and all 39 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 months ago
u/ines_ekstrom148 points·2 months ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_chukwu63 points·2 months ago

Did SWB respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ravi_bergstrom18 points·2 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]12 points·2 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/aleksi_marchand-22 points·2 months ago

the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_lindqvist177 points·2 months ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_tamm87 points·2 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_bruun213 points·2 months ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →