[Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on glycaemic control
Week 88 update. 19kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 45.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Came off after 49 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
insulin and sulfonylurea interactions are real hypo risk
Stalled for 14 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 3.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
This is correct. Hypo risk is real.
Not to be pedantic but glycaemic control and CGM are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.
- 1Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different…5 comments in this branch · started by u/plain_titration
- 2I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry…5 comments in this branch · started by u/teodor_duarte