Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aalborg.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on [Caution] stacking with a sulfonylurea is a real hypo risk, not a theoretical one in c/t2dglp1 · 12 points · 1 days ago
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
comment on [Results] A1c 9.1 → 5.4, full table, 14 months in c/t2dglp1 · 98 points · 2 days ago
comment on [Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably in c/cryptopay · 6 points · 3 days ago
Not to be pedantic but gas fees and confirmations are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated in c/retatrutide · 121 points · 5 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Explainer] the crypto discount is real and so is losing chargeback rights in c/cryptopay · 6 points · 7 days ago
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 47 points · 12 days ago
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 53 points · 20 days ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on [Struggle] eight weeks, 2kg, doing everything right, and it is grinding me down in c/progresspics · 1 points · 22 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with non-scale victory, not with what you concluded.
comment on chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/cryptopay · 8 points · 25 days ago
The discount was 95.1% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 1.0mg, week 18, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one…
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · -33 points · 1 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 240 points · 1 months ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/newbiequestions repeats that dose escalation is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and…
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 95 in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 2 months ago
Crossposting this to c/glp1uk because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on am I the only one who found timeframe harder than the injections in c/progresspics · 11 points · 3 months ago
the milestone milestone is worth posting
comment on glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 16 points · 3 months ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 64 points · 3 months ago
What was the dosing schedule in that arm?
No trophies yet. Most accounts here never get one.
Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.
sigmaaldrich.comSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference