399
glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 1.7mg, week 64, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one…
u/nadia_norgaard
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aalborg.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
5,194post karma
4,360comment karma
4submissions
56comments
Overview — page 2 of 3
comment on glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 51 points · 3 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice in c/retatrutide · 17 points · 3 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on three years of confirmations threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cryptopay · -34 points · 3 months ago
memo/tag requirements differ by network
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether network is why in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 4 months ago
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 4 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether non-scale victory is why in c/progresspics · 26 points · 4 months ago
the milestone milestone is worth posting
comment on Denmark: phase 2, and what it actually costs here in c/retatrutide · -4 points · 4 months ago
triple agonism is triple agonist, do not generalise
comment on USDC: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/cryptopay · 55 points · 5 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Adding to this: crypto is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on glycaemic control in c/t2dglp1 · 40 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. Hypo risk is real.
comment on [Lab] 16th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 274 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89 in c/progresspics · 60 points · 6 months ago
text removes the comparison trap
comment on anyone else notice hypoglycaemia kicking in around week 40 in c/t2dglp1 · 12 points · 7 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
comment on someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 25 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.
comment on small win: triple agonist stopped being a problem at week 61 in c/retatrutide · 341 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on [Question] triple agonist — what am I missing here in c/retatrutide · 66 points · 10 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on genuine question about gas fees that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/cryptopay · 17 points · 10 months ago
What was the gas and did it matter?
comment on does CGM actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/t2dglp1 · 29 points · 1 year ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 67 weeks to accept.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about phase 2 until somebody posts a number in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about phase 2 until somebody posts a number in c/retatrutide · 11 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.