u/nadia_norgaard
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aalborg.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on [Caution] stacking with a sulfonylurea is a real hypo risk, not a theoretical one in c/t2dglp1 · 12 points · 1 days ago
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
comment on [Results] A1c 9.1 → 5.4, full table, 14 months in c/t2dglp1 · 98 points · 2 days ago
comment on [Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably in c/cryptopay · 6 points · 3 days ago
Not to be pedantic but gas fees and confirmations are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated in c/retatrutide · 121 points · 5 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Explainer] the crypto discount is real and so is losing chargeback rights in c/cryptopay · 6 points · 7 days ago
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 47 points · 12 days ago
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 53 points · 20 days ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on [Struggle] eight weeks, 2kg, doing everything right, and it is grinding me down in c/progresspics · 1 points · 22 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with non-scale victory, not with what you concluded.
comment on chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/cryptopay · 8 points · 25 days ago
The discount was 95.1% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · -33 points · 1 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 240 points · 1 months ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 95 in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 2 months ago
Crossposting this to c/glp1uk because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on am I the only one who found timeframe harder than the injections in c/progresspics · 11 points · 3 months ago
the milestone milestone is worth posting
comment on glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 16 points · 3 months ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 64 points · 3 months ago
What was the dosing schedule in that arm?
comment on glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 51 points · 3 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice in c/retatrutide · 17 points · 3 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual