is it normal to get fatigue at week 80
Quick one. Canada here.
CGM works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 23 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
glycaemic control first, that is the original indication
the 85 A1c trend is the answer
the 85 A1c trend is the answer
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 30 weeks to accept.
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
The reflux was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect
type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 26 weeks to accept.
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
- 1Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.14 comments in this branch · started by u/a1c_arc