GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Resolved] the QST batch dispute — vendor retested, numbers matched, my error — 22 comments in the full submission. View in context.
786
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 months ago by u/solene_eriksen

[Resolved] the QST batch dispute — vendor retested, numbers matched, my error

Resolvedbranch of 8 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 5mg, week 48, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 3 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am…

Read the full submission and all 22 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 29 days ago
u/lina_almeida11 points·29 days ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_eriksenOP6 points·29 days ago

First order from HJ was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts3 points·28 days ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thermal_mass_tom2 points·28 days ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_eriksenOP1 point·28 days ago

First order from MKM was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adnan_sandvik1 point·28 days ago

First order from MKM was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower.

Adding to this: testing is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zofia_lindholm-16 points·29 days ago

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]4 points·28 days ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.