GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
641
c/vendorvetting·submitted 3 days ago by u/reship_roulette

[Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside

Resolvedbranch of 6 comments

Package went missing between Zhuhai and here. Tracking died in a transit hub and stayed dead for eleven days. Sent one email with a screenshot of the dead tracking page and the order number. Reply the next morning, replacement shipped four days later at their cost, arrived in nine days. No argument, no "prove it", no…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 days ago
u/refund_ledger183 points·2 days ago

this goes straight into the ledger. running tally is now 34 reship/refund outcomes across 11 vendors, and the spread between the best and worst is much wider than the spread in purity.

replysharereportpermalink
u/due_diligence_dee121 points·2 days ago

can you post the tally? that seems like more useful decision data than the purity averages honestly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/refund_ledger94 points·2 days ago

working on it. the problem is that half the entries are unverifiable — somebody says they got a refund and there is nothing to check. i only want to publish the ones with receipts and that cuts it to about 20.

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingvetting78 points·2 days ago

publish the 20 and say it is 20. a small honest table beats a big soft one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/refund_ledger52 points·2 days ago

yeah. doing that.

replysharereportpermalink
u/burned_once_twice66 points·2 days ago

after losing £340 to a group buy i now weight reship policy above price and roughly level with purity. it is the only thing that protects you from the failure mode that actually happens.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.