GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of help me understand vendor, I have read the wiki twice — 55 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.1k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/camila_sandvik

help me understand vendor, I have read the wiki twice

Labbranch of 7 comments

Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time. I have 14 data points over 18 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 55 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/throwaway_titration80 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvikOP45 points·2 years ago

How many orders from WWB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvikOP25 points·2 years ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_count_stan12 points·2 years ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/denied_again_d11 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 95.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard96 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_vanhecke59 points·2 years ago

the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →