[Question] how do you actually verify Medutest
Quick one. Canada here.
reship works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 10 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
SSA order #18, Poland, no drama, receipts inside
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
No.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
SSA order #9, Sweden, no drama, receipts inside
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SWB.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
FGP three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 99.2% anyway, so no harm done.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
The VendorInvestigate and Janoshik numbers on the same vial from TFC came back 97.4% and 98.3%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
- 1Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.9 comments in this branch · started by u/batch_number_bertie
- 2Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.6 comments in this branch · started by u/ipamorelin_i