GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
7k
c/vendorvetting·posted 6 months ago by u/bpc_sceptic

[PSA] Medutest is not what most of this community thinks it is

PSA Clean Column ×4 Receipts ×3 Sourced ×2

Quick one. Canada here.

Janoshik works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.

Specifics: the route I used took 24 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.

Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.

27,149 up / 20,147 down57% upvoted58 commentsid 5q3z2315 Jan 2026

58 comments

30 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/nordic_pricing325 points·6 months ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ignacio_silva272 points·6 months ago

Yeah, SSA took 2 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_weiss-16 points·6 months ago

FGP three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.1% anyway, so no harm done.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsen1 point·6 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]1 point·6 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinski1 point·6 months ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticOPresearch peptides1 point·6 months ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion1 point·6 months ago·edited

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics1 point·6 months ago

the reship rate on BCH is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida151 points·6 months ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticOPresearch peptides97 points·6 months ago

HJ took 24 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvik76 points·6 months ago

the reship rate on TFC is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieindependent tester44 points·6 months ago

the batch number or it did not happen

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka26 points·6 months ago

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kravchenko20 points·6 months ago

the reship rate on FGP is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/cormac_pereira102 points·6 months ago
i have this exact spreadsheet
replysharereportpermalink
u/bence_zielinski27 points·6 months ago

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cormac_pereira66 points·6 months ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with PeptideMeter, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dagny_ogunleye56 points·6 months ago

QST took 3 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertievetting20 points·6 months ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka5 points·6 months ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieMOD55 points·6 months ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringe1920 points·6 months ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitru15 points·6 months ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_brandt8 points·6 months ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_ndiaye35 points·6 months ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nz_unfunded19 points·6 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_zamora15 points·6 months ago·edited

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticOPresearch peptides7 points·6 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1.

Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ipamorelin_i24 points·6 months ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.8% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.