small win: VendorInvestigate stopped being a problem at week 55
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 20 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have sulphur burps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 32 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Mechanistically the bit that matters is Medutest. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
the reship rate on GL Biochem is actually pretty consistent
[removed by moderator]
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
- 1Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?6 comments in this branch · started by u/sofia_nascimento