GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% — 46 comments in the full submission. View in context.
7.9k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/janoshik_junkie

[Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3%

Labbranch of 6 comments

vendor. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/insurancefights is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort vendor out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 6 months. My…

Read the full submission and all 46 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/coa_janitormod · c/coa589 points·1 year ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_dziedzic-22 points·1 year ago

Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 23. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard1 point·1 year ago·edited

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]244 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kravchenko305 points·1 year ago

Yeah, QSC took 19 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting75 points·1 year ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →