VendorInvestigate: what the trials say vs what this community says
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 1.0mg, week 2, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — VendorInvestigate — and tracked it for 18 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 45 weeks to accept.
the reship rate on ERP is actually pretty consistent
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Tested 8 batches from TFC over 20 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
QST took 22 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
the batch number or it did not happen
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Reship experience: KP asked for photos, processed it in 16 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
- 1one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread7 comments in this branch · started by u/kofi_ferreira
- 2independent test or vendor COA, which is it6 comments in this branch · started by u/britt_zamora