reading reship threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/maintenancephase repeats that order records is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 15 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
How many orders from WXT is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Yeah, HJ took 24 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Yeah, WXT took 20 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
SGN order #4, Germany, no drama, receipts inside
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
First order from ERP was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
- 1I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry…8 comments in this branch · started by u/sterile_field_steph
- 2Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.5 comments in this branch · started by u/ledger_mod