GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 6 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 68 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.7k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/zeynep_zielinski

[Results] 6 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Vendorbranch of 15 comments

Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time. I have 14 data points over 24 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 68 comments →

This branch

15 comments, started 1 year ago
u/titration_marshalmod · c/semaglutide307 points·1 year ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingMOD173 points·1 year ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_zamora105 points·1 year ago

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink
u/thermal_mass_tom202 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinskiOP117 points·1 year ago

Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was WWB.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye81 points·1 year ago

the reship rate on CPC is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/thermal_mass_tom65 points·1 year ago

Is that a VendorInvestigate result or are you quoting the vendor COA?

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinskiOP117 points·1 year ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik247 points·1 year ago·edited

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida59 points·1 year ago

the batch number or it did not happen

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_ibarra216 points·1 year ago

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_nyberg50 points·1 year ago

SSA order #16, Sweden, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_nascimento178 points·1 year ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinskiOP98 points·1 year ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 24 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]36 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.