GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the Janoshik question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 13 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.4k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/anders_osei

the Janoshik question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Needs Sourcebranch of 7 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 12.5mg, week 85, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — VendorInvestigate — and tracked it for 2 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted…

Read the full submission and all 13 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/zeynep_villalobos660 points·2 years ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zofia_lindholm152 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/kofi_ferreira-27 points·2 years ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/ghrp_history1 point·2 years ago·edited

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]487 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka171 points·2 years ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ireland_drugs_pay292 points·2 years ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →